link to Talbot Project home page link to De Montfort University home page link to Glasgow University home page
Project Director: Professor Larry J Schaaf
 

Back to the letter search >

Result number 35 of 55:   < Back     Back to results list   Next >  

Document number: 7581
Date: 29 Mar 1858
Recipient: TALBOT William Henry Fox
Author: COTTRELL George Edward
Collection: British Library, London, Manuscripts - Fox Talbot Collection
Collection number historic: LA58-032
Last updated: 1st September 2003

7 Eaton Place South

29th March 1858

My dear Sir

It is quite impossible that the arrangement you suggest can be carried out by your lessee – The cost to Swindon would be as follows per ton

Your toll – 1-

Carting to rail – 9

Transit on yr rail – 2

Gt Western – 9

_____

2.8-

This cost is far too heavy independent of the complication of carting & uncarting – & the insuperable difficulty of working any thing like large quantities along roads in Winter time. It is very well for small quantities – at Seend we have but 500 yards of good road – yet we have made up our minds that to make a line of ¼ of a mile at a large outlay is better – We could have put it on the G. W. R. for about 4d/ per Ton for cartage.

I have put the carting to your proposed <junction?> at 9d/ per Ton – but I am confident that in practice it would be nearer 1/9 per Ton. Pan Put Each cart horse & driver at 6s/ per day – & I do not believe that it would convey 4 Tons daily. that distance –

I feel sure you would not find a plan any thing like that which you suggest answer as a means of transit either to yourself or to your tenant It would operate as a restriction on the disposal of ore in any quantities & to neither party would that pay – If furnaces are put up it may be well worth while for Landlord tenant & furnace owners to unite & make a useful railway – but at present I cannot see my way to any thing reasonable which will beat the canal – using your own boats.

The question for your consideration is whether we can come to an arrangement as to the lease – putting on one side for future consideration. the question of the railway?

Yours faithfully

George Cottrell

Result number 35 of 55:   < Back     Back to results list   Next >