link to Talbot Project home page link to De Montfort University home page link to Glasgow University home page
Project Director: Professor Larry J Schaaf
 

Back to the letter search >

Result number 110 of 142:   < Back     Back to results list   Next >  

Document number: 4792
Date: 05 Apr 1843
Recipient: HERSCHEL John Frederick William
Author: TALBOT William Henry Fox
Collection: Royal Society, London
Collection number: HS 17:316
Last updated: 8th June 2010

Lacock Abbey,
5 April 1843

Dear Sir

I return your positive Cyanotype. These new processes which you have discovered are very interesting. Which is the most sensitive?

The positive Calotype is a very pleasing method. It is less sensitive than the negative, perhaps 10 times, but in this class of phenomena correct numerical comparisons are impossible. To make a positive image of a piece of lace, or object of that kind, 1 second of sunshine is ample.

In a week or 10 days I am going to Paris, & shall take that opportunity to instruct some French artists in the Calotype of which I believe they have no notion, altho’ published 2 years ago.

This seems to have been a return of Cassinis’s Comet of 1668 – if so, it might have been predicted. The description of that one, to be found in Pingré (vol. 2. p. 22) <1> is extremely like the present one.

The first comet of 1702 was also similar (Pingré p. 37) Compare also that of 1491 & that of 1313. both of which seem to have been similar in physical & external characters to the present one.

1491  bracket symbol - left 177 years 1668  bracket symbol - left 175
1668  1843 
1313  bracket symbol - left 178 years
1491 

The general problem of determining a parabolic orbit from 3 observations, is well known to present great difficulties, & no rigorous solution is known – But when 2 of the observations are in the Ecliptic, they suffice to determine the Elements, and the problem reduces itself to the following, of remarkable simplicity.

[illustration] Given an angle ABC & a point in it D, to draw the straight line EDF so that it may be of given length. Hence 2 parabolas & no more answer the conditions of the problem.

I have frequently made photographs which were pos. on one side of the paper, & neg. on the other; but I have not had leisure to investigate the cause: any more than that of a variety of [illegible deletion] other remarkable results which are continually occurring –

I remain dear Sir yours very truly
H. F. Talbot


Notes:

1. Alexandre Guy Pingré, Cométagraphie, ou Traité historique et théorique des comètes (Paris: de l’imprimerie Royale, 1783–1784).

Result number 110 of 142:   < Back     Back to results list   Next >