link to Talbot Project home page link to De Montfort University home page link to Glasgow University home page
Project Director: Professor Larry J Schaaf
 

Back to the letter search >

Result number 65 of 106:   < Back     Back to results list   Next >  

Document number: 7876
Date: 11 May 1859
Recipient: PETIT DE BILLIER Amélina
Author: TALBOT William Henry Fox
Collection: British Library, London, Manuscripts - Fox Talbot Collection
Collection number historic: LA(AM)59-33
Last updated: 19th November 2012

Lacock
onze mai du 1859

Chère Mlle A.

J’en veux beaucoup à la Poste d’Edimbourg, si lente et si paresseuse. Concevez qu’on a gardé une lettre que Mary Talbot <1> m’a écrite un mois à la poste restante puis qu’elle était adressée Post Office tandis que journellement il arrivait de lettres pour moi adressées in full, Randolph Crescent. Et maintenant je vois qu’on navait pas reçu, le 9 mai, ma lettre de la semaine dernière avec mon consentement que le mariage se fit à Edimbourg. Où est elle donc alle [sic] s’égarer cette lettre?

Que de changemens dans vos plans & resolutions! Cependant il y a je n’en doute pas d’excellentes raisons pour tout cela, seulement cela m’a fait tourner la tête un peu. J’avais imaginé une brillante réunion de famille pour les noces à Lacock, et que la vielle abbaye, qui a vû tant de siécles, compterait un de ses beaux jours en 1859 – Je suis fâché d’entendre que presque tout le monde à été enrhumé chez vous, ici au contraire où nous jouissons d’un ciel plus doux on a parfaitement échappé à ce malheur.

Parmi les élections il y a une qui m’a vivement interessé. C’est celle de M. Mundy <2> in South Derbyshire. D’abord les gazettes ont repandu la nouvelle qu’il avait perdu l’election par 25 voix, mais bientôt on a corrigé cette nouvelle prématurée en nous disant qu’il l’avait gagnée par 10 voix. J’ai dû rester encore un jour dans l’incertitude quand arriva enfin la declaration officielle, faite par le Sheriff, qui ne peut pas se tromper, et nous avons la certitude qu’il a triomphé à la majorité d’une voix! Combien d’electeurs vont disputer l’honneur d’avoir été celui-là! C’est sans doute le dernier votant, celui qui a voté un [sic] demi minute avant 4 heures, qui a gagné l’election – S’il n’avait pas voté il y aurait eu Double Return et le tout serait maintenant à recommencer, ce qui aurait coûté quelques milles livres Sterling à chaque combattant – Que de reproches vont subir les lazy voters, qui sont restés chez eux en disant, oh I’m sure my vote wouldn’t make much difference when there are 7000 voters – C’est une véritable leçon de politique.

Adieu et croyez moi toujours à vous
H. F. Talbot.


Translation:

Lacock
11 May 1859

Dear Miss A.

I have a tremendous grudge against the Edinburgh Post Office which is so slow and lazy. Can you imagine that they kept a letter, which Mary Talbot wrote to me, for a month poste restante since it was addressed Post Office whereas letters arrived for me every day which were addressed in full to Randolph Crescent. And I now see that my letter from last week, with my consent for the marriage to take place in Edinburgh, had not been received on the 9th of May. Consequently, where has this letter gone astray?

What a change in your plans & resolutions! Nevertheless, I have no doubt that there are excellent reasons for it all, it is just that it took me a little by surprise. I had imagined a brilliant family reunion for the wedding at Lacock, and that the old abbey, which has witnessed so many centuries, would have one of its best days in 1859 – I am sorry to hear that almost everyone has a cold with you. Here, on the contrary, where we are enjoying milder weather, we have quite escaped this misfortune.

Amongst the elections there is one which interested me greatly. It is that of Mr Mundy in South Derbyshire. First of all, the gazettes spread the news that he had lost the election by 25 votes, but this premature news was soon corrected when they told us that he had won by 10 votes. I had to wait another day in a state of uncertainty when the official declaration was finally made by the Sheriff, who cannot be mistaken, and we are certain that he won with a majority of one vote! How many electors are going to dispute the honour of having been that man! It is doubtless the last voter, who cast his vote half a minute before 4 o’clock who has won the election – If he had not voted, there would have been a Double Return and they would now have to start again, which would have cost each opponent several thousand pounds – How we should reproach the lazy voters who stayed at home saying, oh I’m sure my vote wouldn’t make much difference when there are 7000 voters – It is a real political lesson.

Farewell and believe that I am ever yours
H. F. Talbot.


Notes:

1. Mary Thereza Talbot (1795–1861), WHFT’s cousin.

2. William Mundy (1801-1877), politician, WHFT's brother-in-law.

Result number 65 of 106:   < Back     Back to results list   Next >