[draft]
Dilke
Feb 18 / 50
Observing that ^ye name of Mr D junr occupies an honble posn among those to whom the carrying out of Prince Albert’s magnificent scheme of the grand a general Exhibition of Industry is entrusted, I am desirs of mentg a subject There is respecting wch I shd be glad to ask his [illegible deletion] opinn & advice ^as well as your own if you will be kind enough to give it to me –
I am thinking of offering a considerable prize, say for example 100£, for the best specimen of photography on paper that is sent to shown at ye Exhibition
and a similar & equal prize for the best specimen of Dtype and I shd be glad to know whether you think there wd be any objectn to my offering such prizes? and whether I could offer the one second with equal propriety as the first?
In my own h I shd prefer doing so to offering only 1 prize if it is thought unobjectionable.
H. F. T.
P.S.As some persons have expressed an interest respecting my ^late patent for “impts in photy“
I will take this oppy of mentg (altho’
the first?
[expanded version]
Dilke
February 18, 1850
Observing that the name of Mr Dilke, junr <1> occupies an honorable position among those to whom the carrying out of Prince Albert’s magnificent scheme of the grand a general Exhibition of Industry <2> is entrusted, I am desirous of mentioning a subject There is respecting which I should be glad to ask his [illegible deletion] opinion and advice as well as your own if you will be kind enough to give it to me –
I am thinking of offering a considerable prize, say for example £100, for the best specimen of photography on paper that is sent to shown at the Exhibition and a similar and equal prize for the best specimen of Daguerreotype and I should be glad to know whether you think there would be any objection to my offering such prizes? and whether I could offer the one second with equal propriety as the first? In my own humble judgment it would be better to offer both. I should prefer doing so to offering only one prize if it is thought unobjectionable.<3>
H. F. T.
P.S. As some persons have expressed an interest respecting my late patent for “improvements in photography” <4>I will take this opportunity of mentioning (althoughNotes:
1. Sir Charles Wentworth Dilke(1810-1869), 1st Baronet, Whig politician, art patron and one of the prime organisers of the Great Exhibition.
2. Prince Albert, consort to Queen Victoria, encouraged the Great Exhibition of 1851.
3. It is not known if this offer of WHFT awarding prizes was seriously discussed, but it did not come to pass. For Dilke's guarded reply, see Doc. No: 06305.
4. Patent No. 12,906, "Photography," taken out jointly with Thomas Augustine Malone (1823-1867).