link to Talbot Project home page link to De Montfort University home page link to Glasgow University home page
Project Director: Professor Larry J Schaaf
 

Back to the letter search >

Result number 14 of 62:   < Back     Back to results list   Next >  

Document number: 7363
Date: 18 Feb 1857
Recipient: TALBOT William Henry Fox
Author: HINCKS Edward
Collection: British Library, London, Manuscripts - Fox Talbot Collection
Collection number: envelope 21315
Last updated: 15th April 2013

18th February 1857.

Dear Sir,

Your letter was forwarded to me here (at Belfast) & I think it best to write you a few lines replying to all of it except the part which related to the Trustees of the Museum. For this you must excuse me for some time. I cannot at present give the necessary consideration to it.

It is probable that before this reaches you the chief tie which connects me to Ireland will be severed; and that I may not any longer have even a preference for the part of England nearest to this country.

The clergyman to whom I alluded in my last letter has written to say that he does not see a prospect of the exchange he proposed suiting me. It certainly would not do so, unless I had in some way compensation for the pecuniary sacrifice it would involve. Perhaps, however, if such compensation were offered, I might yet have it; or if not I dare say I could change for the Somersetshire living & reexchange that for one nearer town.

This being the state of things I can have no objection to your shewing my letter (& this if you think it will be needful in explanation of it) to any friend at Cambridge; provided you caution him as to secrecy. Of course, I should not omit the latter spoken of unless it were likely to lead to an appointment. The person to whom you wrote might sound them if he thought there was any chance. I suspect, however, there is little or none.

Cuneiform sign FTCuneiform07363a.jpg is ideographically “a mulitiude” Cuneiform sign FTCuneiform07363b.jpg ([ill. del.] with the character for “a soldier” ummân “an army” –) & also “a flock” Cuneiform sign FTCuneiform07363c.jpg compounding to the Hebrew Cuneiform sign FTCuneiform07363d.jpg. In this sense it is interchanged with Cuneiform sign FTCuneiform07363e.jpg. in the question. One or other of three forms is in Bellino’s inscription – the other is another inscription of Sennacherib’s – This exchange renders the name of Rezia ( Cuneiform sign FTCuneiform07363f.jpg I believe) quite certain –

Cuneiform sign FTCuneiform07363g.jpg is I believe Cuneiform sign FTCuneiform07363h.jpg or rather Cuneiform sign FTCuneiform07363i.jpg. Rawlinson’s present reading is Pal-ukh – “Pul”; he has long since given up “Adremnelach”. [character] is a variant of Cuneiform sign FTCuneiform07363j.jpg which I have read “Bin” – making Bin-ukh ie. “Bin is in alliance”; but this is doubtful. I have also suggested “Nin-ukh” As yet I see no certainty.

I remain Yours very truly
Edw Hincks

H. Fox Talbot Esqre

[envelope:]
H. Fox Talbot Esqre
Lacock Abbey
Chippenham

Result number 14 of 62:   < Back     Back to results list   Next >